🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Trend

In Europe, a rising chorus of countries are moving toward parallel measures.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". A law may be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Officials have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged parliament to pass a bill increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a related move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged families to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for minors without guardian approval is given. Although it warns of the "addictive" nature of these services, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a useful starting point," stated the European lawmaker driving the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the government has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "supported by robust research".

Last year, interest grew behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the administration committed to further research the topic.

Charities have raised warnings. An organization founded by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after encountering dangerous social media material argues that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are secure and fit for minors," stated a leading peer.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, action is primarily occurring at the regional level due to country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted bills mandating adult authorization for minors to set up social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from some politicians to follow the Australian example, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Beyond Europe and the US, other nations are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, world agencies adopt a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might backfire". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

While this global discussion continues, the actions of this nation and its followers show that policymakers globally are less and less prepared to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.